Re: Updated my page with Jim Patterson Cuprotypes

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Updated my page with Jim Patterson Cuprotypes
From: Joseph Smigiel <jsmigiel@net-link.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:15:03 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <CE29D3825485344B9909EEADF243B07402248AC7@mailc.lumcnet.prod.intern>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <003101c80f39$e3d9bf70$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><CE29D3825485344B9909EEADF243B07402248AB9@mailc.lumcnet.prod.intern><CE29D3825485344B9909EEADF243B07402248AC7@mailc.lumcnet.prod.intern>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Any idea which copper compound results to form the final image? Are these stable?

Joe

On Nov 11, 2007, at 4:23 AM, C.Breukel@lumc.nl wrote:

I did a few more experiments with Jim Patterson's Cuprotype, including toning with Amidol (the resulting colour is quite pleasing, I think I prefer it to the starting colour).

Anyway check out:

http://home.casema.nl/cordieuwke/Cuprotype.html

For the details and images,

Best,

Cor

References:
- Updated my page with Jim Patterson Cuprotypes
  - From: C.Breukel@lumc.nl