RE: epson 3000 still a viable option?
Yes, but as Jack said it is older and I feel really benefits from the use of Image Print much more than using a program like QTR. It would be a fine machine to get for free : ) Ink and paper will add up with any printer. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype ejprinter > -----Original Message----- > From: jfulton [mailto:jfulton@sfai.edu] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:58 PM > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: Re: epson 3000 still a viable option? > > Yes it is but the technology is quite old and I feel you'd be best > served with a newer machine . . . money well spent. > However, if indeed you are really short of money and are just > dabbling and don't wish to spend money, go for it and you will > learn a lot. There is nothing wrong with older technology because > that is exactly how we all got to here and superb prints > were made with that machine. > Jack > > > On November2007, at 6:26 PM, Erie Patsellis wrote: > > > I have the ability to get an epson 3000 for cheap (as in free). is > > it still a viable option for quadtone printing and digital negatives? > > > > > > erie > >
|