RE: Epson 3000 still a viable option?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Epson 3000 still a viable option?
From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:19:48 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <47390B56.7070501@shelbyvilledesign.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcglnR+U9aaJqykERNGU9MqIkntEQwA4Eccg

Erie,

Using Quadtone RIP this printer could make a decent printer. Also the Full
Spectrum Neutral inks from MIS can be used with the old Pieziography R9
driver. The FSN inks can also be used with the John Wolfe curves.

The printer is pretty slow but can make pretty decent prints.

Don Bryant

-----Original Message-----
From: Erie Patsellis [mailto:erie@shelbyvilledesign.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:27 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: epson 3000 still a viable option?

I have the ability to get an epson 3000 for cheap (as in free). is it 
still a viable option for quadtone printing and digital negatives?


erie

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epson 3000 still a viable option?
  - From: Erie Patsellis <erie@shelbyvilledesign.com>

References:
- epson 3000 still a viable option?
  - From: Erie Patsellis <erie@shelbyvilledesign.com>