Re: Epson 3000 still a viable option?

[Erie Patsellis <erie@shelbyvilledesign.com>]

Don,
I already have a HP8750 that I like, but the 13x19 limit is a little 
restrictive (alot of my work is scanned LF negatives, that due to a lack 
of darkroom, I can't print at the moment) With my upcoming 16x20 camera 
almost finished, I have a way to scan, but not print, and it seems 
pointless to scan a 16x20 neg to print smaller.


erie

Don Bryant wrote:
> Erie,
>
> Using Quadtone RIP this printer could make a decent printer. Also the Full
> Spectrum Neutral inks from MIS can be used with the old Pieziography R9
> driver. The FSN inks can also be used with the John Wolfe curves.
>
> The printer is pretty slow but can make pretty decent prints.
>
> Don Bryant
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erie Patsellis [mailto:erie@shelbyvilledesign.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:27 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: epson 3000 still a viable option?
>
> I have the ability to get an epson 3000 for cheap (as in free). is it 
> still a viable option for quadtone printing and digital negatives?
>
>
> erie
>
>
>
>
>