RE: Inkjet negs: Pigment vs. Dye, etc.

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Inkjet negs: Pigment vs. Dye, etc.
From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:14:19 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <7D015C8C-BFF1-4B93-8D73-F91D386F22AE@pacifier.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcgyysDUiDRKeF3CQFymgMwzMcdDcwAAVgLQ

Katharine,

>
Now I have a better printer that  can actually print on  
transparencies  (1280) and get great results with cheap  
transparencies, so I'm no longer oiling negatives.
>

The reason Leipke uses waxed digital paper negs is for the look that it
produces not as a substitute for inkjet transparency material. Take a look
at the View Camera article for more details.

Don Bryant

References:
- Re: Inkjet negs: Pigment vs. Dye, etc.
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

go to date index
go to thread index