RE: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B
I do not have exact measurements right here, but I believe the lith film is about half the thickness than regular film. I had no sharpness problems when exposing 8*10 lith film. If I would do that again I would probably slide a second (perhaps exposed to max and processed) sheet underneath.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: maandag 10 december 2007 15:57
Subject: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B
Can anyone tell me the thickness of regular panchromatic film? How floppy, for want of a better word, (maybe practical?), is 0.004mm film in 8x10 inch size?
Seasons greetings from wet windy Manchester, England.
----- Original Message -----
From: david drake
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B
I have been using Arista Premium Halftone Supreme from Freestyle for making my enlarged negatives. I wasn't aware of the Ultralfine until now. Has anyone compared the two? The thicker base is appealing (.007 ml. instead of Arista's .004 ml.)
On 9-Dec-07, at 11:34 PM, Erie Patsellis wrote:
Ortho Lith film can be addictive, Ultrafine online has .007 thick lith film here: http://www.ultrafineonline.com/ulhicoorlifi.html. I use their contone dupe film in camera a great deal, and it's cost effective as well.
Sandy King wrote:
Just want to thank Dave Soemarko for his LC-1B formula, which I just used for the first time this evening in an attempt to do some BTZS type testing with a Kodak Ortho lith film. I had forgotten about this formula and did some initial tests with various other formulas, with very bad results.
Then I remembered Dave's work on the formula that was published in Post Factory, and in the book by Christopher James. So I went to James, got the formula and mixed up the soup. It really worked great. You have to really test this lith film carefully because it is trigger happy in terms of contrast, but with a bit of work I was able to derive data that should allow me to expose the film in the field over a fairly wide range of SB R and develop for continuous tone.
I might mention that the immediate reason for this testing lies in the fact that I just took delivery on a new Richard Ritter 20X24" camera. Very rigid, with a full range of movements, and weighs 23 lbs! I have some continuous tone film on hand but at the current price I thought it might be interesting to get used to the camera with lith film, which is much less expensive. And as luck would have it, I have a couple hundred sheets of Kodak Ortho lith film, so that is what I am experimenting with. With the very good success I have had with the Soemarko LC-1B formula I figure in a day or two I will be ready to load the new featherweight camera in the SUV and hit the trails.
BTW, if anyone is interested in seeing pictures of the feather weight 20X24, go here, http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?t=31245
Also note the round photography in the background of all three pictures. That photograph is a portrait of me made by the famous photographer Sam Wang.
david drake photography
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release Date: 09/12/2007 11:06