alt-photo-process-l Mailing List - by Thread

• go to date index

• Ebay Blend-O-Color, John Cremati
• Sury, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Réf. : Sury, Philippe Berger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Sury, Christina Z. Anderson
    • Réf. : Sury, Philippe Berger
      • RE: Réf. : Sury, Marek Matusz
      • Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury, Philippe Berger
      • Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury, Philippe Berger
      • =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?_RE=3A_R=E9f=2E_=3A_Sury?=, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury, Richard Knoppow
    • RE: Sury, Don Bryant
      • Réf. : RE: Sury, Philippe Berger
    • Sury patent, Alberto Novo
      • Réf. : Sury patent, Philippe Berger
      • Re: Réf. : Sury patent, Alberto Novo
      • Re: Réf. : Sury patent, Damiano Bianca
      • Re: Réf. : Sury patent, dklinker
    • Re: Sury, Richard Knoppow
• Seurat, John Grocott
  • Re: Seurat, Judy Seigel
• HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, BOB KISS
  • Réf. : HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, Philippe Berger
  • RE: HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, Dave S
    • Re: HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, Marilyn Dalrymple
  • Re: HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, dklinker
  • Re: HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, david drake
    • HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!! Feliz Navidad!!, Sandy King
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!, Ender100
• Carbon Transfer Process Website, Philippe Berger
• Carbon Photography, Philippe Berger
• gum mixes, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Re: gum mixes, john
  • Re: gum mixes, Kees Brandenburg
  • RE: gum mixes, Marek Matusz
  • Re: gum mixes, Joseph Smigiel
  • Re: gum mixes, Henry Rattle
    • Re: gum mixes, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: gum mixes, davidhatton
      • Re: gum mixes, Kees Brandenburg
      • Re: gum mixes, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Réf. : Re: gum mixes, Philippe Berger
      • Re: Réf. : Re: gum mixes, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Re: gum mixes, Guido Ceuppens
• Point of Point, John Grocott
• unscubscribe, wendy currie
• Re: Reprise ...Re: archivalness of gum, Ender100
• =?UTF-8?Q?printing_on_glass=3F?=, shepherd
• archivality is not a single measure, Ryuji Suzuki
• direct carbon or gum bleach development, Marek Matusz
  • Re: direct carbon or gum bleach development, Keith Gerling
• Javelle water and gum 1907, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Re: Javelle water and gum 1907, Judy Seigel
    • Digital negative ???, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: Digital negative ???, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: Digital negative ???, Don Bryant
      • Re: Digital negative ???, Yves Gauvreau
  • RE: Javelle water and gum 1907, Marek Matusz
• archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Reprise ...Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Reprise ...Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: Reprise ...Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: archivalness of gum, jfulton
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: archivalness of gum, jfulton
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: archivalness of gum, jfulton
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, BOB KISS
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • "Carbon" or "Carbon Carbon"?, Judy Seigel
      • Re: archivalness of gum, john
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Sandy King
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • [point of the point] was Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Sandy King
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Sandy King
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Sandy King
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
  • RE: archivalness of gum, Gawain Weaver
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: archivalness of gum, Marek Matusz
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
  • re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
    • RE: archivalness of gum, BOB KISS
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Diana Bloomfield
      • RE: archivalness of gum, Dave S
      • Re: archivalness of gum, Judy Seigel
      • curators v. doctors, Judy Seigel
      • Re: curators v. doctors, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: curators v. doctors, Christina Z. Anderson
  • RE: archivalness of gum, Marek Matusz
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Image transference; was - archival ness of gum, Don Bryant
      • Re: Image transference; was - archival ness of gum, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: Image transference; was - archival ness of gum, Richard Knoppow
      • clingons, Judy Seigel
      • RE: clingons, Robert W. Schramm
      • RE: clingons, Judy Seigel
    • Re: archivalness of gum, Erich Camerling
• Re: Pinters might be OT, Ender100
  • RE: Pinters might be OT, Kerik
• mounting issues, john
  • Re: mounting issues, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: mounting issues, Alberto Novo
  • Re: mounting issues, Judy Seigel
    • Re: mounting issues, henk thijs
      • Re: mounting issues, dhowk
      • Re: mounting issues, john
  • Re: mounting issues, Thom Mitchell
    • Pinters might be OT, Marek Matusz
      • RE: Pinters might be OT, Don Bryant
      • Re: RE: Pinters might be OT, Projekti Vedos
      • Re: Pinters might be OT, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: Pinters might be OT, sam wang
      • Re: Pinters might be OT, Diana Bloomfield
      • Epson 1400, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Epson 1400, Sandy King
      • Re: Epson 1400, Projekti Vedos
      • Gold Chloride Toner, Mark Kronquist
      • Re: Pinters might be OT, jfulton
      • 2 things to see in NYC, Judy Seigel
      • Re: 2 things to see in NYC, John Grocott
  • Re: mounting issues, Ryuji Suzuki
• Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ryuji Suzuki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Sandy King
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Camden Hardy
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Judy Seigel
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Don Bryant
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Judy Seigel
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ryuji Suzuki
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, richard vallon
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Greg Schmitz
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Camden Hardy
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Judy Seigel
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, BOB KISS
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Sandy King
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, John Grocott
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: On topic: myth or reality?, Judy Seigel
      • Re: On topic: myth or reality?, Sandy King
      • Re: On topic: myth or reality?, Judy Seigel
      • Re: On topic: myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Mark Nelson
  • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ender100
• Info on recording film?, david drake
• DATA ON THIS FILM?, BOB KISS
  • Re: DATA ON THIS FILM?, John Grocott
    • RE: DATA ON THIS FILM?, BOB KISS
      • RE: DATA ON THIS FILM?, Mike Kirwan
      • RE: DATA ON THIS FILM?, Dave S
  • OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
    • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Ryuji Suzuki
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Don Bryant
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Erich Camerling
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Eric Neilsen
      • Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Yves Gauvreau
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Gregory Popovitch
      • RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?, Don Bryant
• Slugs and Blues/Purples, Ross Chambers
• Mucotypes, Mike Ware
  • Re: Mucotypes, John Cremati
    • Re: Mucotypes, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Mucotypes, Malin Fabbri
      • Re: Mucotypes, Mike Ware
  • Re: Mucotypes, jfulton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mucotypes, Ender100
    • Re: Mucotypes, Ken Sinclair
• Carbon Transfer Precess, Philippe Berger
• Slugs, erections and amm. dich., John Grocott
• Re: Sensitized  Slug Slime Recipe, Ender100
  • Re: Sensitized  Slug Slime Recipe, jfulton
  • =?utf-8?Q?Re:_Sensitized=C2=A0_Slug_Slime_Recipe?=, rhobbs3
    • SensitizedSlug Slime Recipe, John Cremati
• Re: Sandy's new camera, Ender100
• Re: Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), Ender100
  • Re: Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), Sandy King
    • Re: Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), sitgesn1
      • Re: Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), Sandy King
  • Re: Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), Bob
• Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, dsbryant
  • Huge Camera (RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B), Dave S
  • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Erie Patsellis
  • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Erie Patsellis
    • RE: Huge Camera, Dave S
      • Re: Huge Camera, Katharine Thayer
      • Gum printing technique, davidhatton
      • Re: Gum printing technique, John Grocott
      • RE: Gum printing technique, Don Bryant
      • Re: Gum printing technique, John Grocott
      • Re: Gum printing technique, Laura Valentino
      • Re: Gum printing technique, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Gum printing technique, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Gum printing technique, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Gum printing technique, Laura Valentino
      • Réf. : Gum printing technique, Philippe Berger
  • Sandy's new camera, Judy Seigel
    • Re: Sandy's new camera, Sandy King
      • Re: Sandy's new camera, Judy Seigel
      • RE: Sandy's new camera, Dave S
      • RE: Sandy's new camera, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Sandy's new camera, Sandy King
      • Re: Sandy's new camera, John Grocott
      • Re: Sandy's new camera, achakali
      • Re: Sandy's new camera, dklinker
      • Cialis/viagra was Sandy's new camera, john
    • RE: Sandy's new camera, Don Bryant
    • RE: Sandy's new camera, Dave S
• Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, RHobbs3
• unsubscribe..., joseph chamberlin
• Re: Sensitized  Slug Slime, Ender100
• Sensitized Slug Slime, John Cremati
  • RE: Sensitized Slug Slime, Dave S
    • Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, John Cremati
      • Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, Diana Bloomfield
      • Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, david drake
      • Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, Dave S
      • Re: Sensitized Slug Slime Recipe, jfulton
• Direct Carbon Paper Available on The Market ?, John Grocott
• Re. Bleach etc.,, John Grocott
  • Re: Re. Bleach etc.,, Loris Medici
• Re. Bleach and Direct Carbon, John Grocott
  • Cryptic British, Alberto Novo
    • Re: Cryptic British, John Simmons
      • Re: Cryptic British, John Grocott
    • Re: Cryptic British, John Grocott
  • Re: Re. Bleach and Direct Carbon, Loris Medici
    • Re: Re. Bleach and Direct Carbon, John Grocott
      • Re: Bleach and Direct Carbon / Direct Carbon Paper Available on TheMarket?, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach and Direct Carbon / Direct Carbon Paper Available on TheMarket?, davidhatton
      • Re: Bleach and Direct Carbon / Direct Carbon Paper Available on TheMarket?, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Bleach and Direct Carbon / Direct Carbon Paper Available on TheMarket?, Judy Seigel
      • RE: Bleach and Direct Carbon / Direct Carbon Paper Available on TheMarket?, Richard Sullivan
  • RE: Re. Bleach and Direct Carbon, Dave S
    • Re: Re. Bleach and Direct Carbon, John Grocott
    • Re: Bleach and Direct Carbon, Alberto Novo
• Bleach, John Grocott
  • Re: Bleach, Loris Medici
  • Re: Bleach, Judy Seigel
    • ''Hippy Tower '' ( was Bleach ), John Grocott
    • Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Sandy King
      • RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Dave S
      • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Erie Patsellis
      • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Jeremy Moore
      • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Sandy King
      • RE: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Dave S
      • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, david drake
      • Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, john
      • RE: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, C.Breukel
      • Re: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Erie Patsellis
      • Re: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, Erie Patsellis
      • Re: Lith film thickness was Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, john
      • Re: Dave Soemarko's LC-1B, jfulton
      • Holiday Season, Dave S
• Eight Days To Become A Master, John Grocott
  • Re: Eight Days To Become A Master, Loris Medici
• apples to apples Javel to Chlorox, Christina Z. Anderson
  • Re: apples to apples Javel to Chlorox, Loris Medici
    • Re: apples to apples Javel to Chlorox, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: apples to apples Javel to Chlorox, Christina Z. Anderson
• Is Unsensitized Paper a More Viable Commercial Proposition, John Grocott
  • "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?), Judy Seigel
    • Re: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?), Loris Medici
      • RE: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?), Dave S
      • Re: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?), Loris Medici
      • RE: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?), Dave S
      • Re: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?)i Loris..., Judy Seigel
• Humidifiers for paper, G Guhan Gunaratnam
• Mareks Use of Javel Water with Gum, John Grocott
  • RE: Mareks Use of Javel Water with Gum, Marek Matusz
    • Re: Mareks Use of Javel Water with Gum, Katharine Thayer
• Lost Origins for Oiling Paper for Negatives, John Grocott
• £2,600,000 Steichen print correction., John Grocott
  • Re: £2,600,000 Steichen print correction., Dan Donovan
    • Re: £2,600,000 Steichen print correction., John Grocott
• RE: The Fresson/Arvel Process, Dave S
• unsubscribe, briscoe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • unsubscribe, joseph chamberlin
• Paper Negatives, pulpfic
  • Re: Paper Negatives, Keith Gerling
    • Message not available
      • Re: Paper Negatives, pulpfic
      • Re: Paper Negatives, Keith Gerling
• Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?, Keith Gerling
  • RE: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?, Don Bryant
  • Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?, Sandy King
  • Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?, Linda Stinchfield
    • Re: Paper Negative Details - Dyes versus Pigments?, Keith Gerling
• ''Oh Baby ! Paraffinum Liquidum. ( Mineral Oil ) says the bottle., John Grocott
  • RE: ''Oh Baby ! Paraffinum Liquidum. ( Mineral Oil ) says the bottle., Don Bryant
    • ''Bog - standard.'', John Grocott
• Any takers on UV light read, Eric Neilsen
  • RE: Any takers on UV light read, Marek Matusz
    • RE: Any takers on UV light read, EJN Photo
  • Re: Any takers on UV light read, Sandy King
    • RE: Any takers on UV light read, EJN Photo
• Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Ender100
• Bleach Development with Gum, John Grocott
  • Re: Bleach Development with Gum, Alberto Novo
• Paper Negative Details, Trevor Cunningham
  • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
  • Re: Paper Negative Details, Andrea Zalme
    • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Paper Negative Details, Don Bryant
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, John Grocott
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Andrea Zalme
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, henk thijs
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, henk thijs
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, pulpfic
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, henk thijs
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, pulpfic
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Sandy King
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, John Grocott
      • Epson PhotoQuality Inkjet Paper, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Paper Negative Details, Don Bryant
      • Re: Paper Negative Details, Andrea Zalme
• Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, zphoto@montana.net
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Jacek
  • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Jacek
• unsubcrive, maria ahlberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: unsubcrive, Ender100
• Gymnastics, John Grocott
• Re: Epson 1280 for sale, Jan Arnow
• Re. Paper Negatives, John Grocott
  • Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Judy Seigel
    • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Gordon Cooper
      • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Judy Seigel
      • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Gordon Cooper
      • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Judy Seigel
      • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Clay
      • Re: Puyo and Demachy said it first [was Re. Paper Negatives], Keith Gerling
  • Re. Paper Negatives, Andrea Zalme
• Paper negative, Jacek
  • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: Paper negative, Robert Krawiec
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, davidhatton
      • Re: Paper negative, Henry Rattle
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, Loris Medici
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, davidhatton
      • Re: Paper negative, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative-- bad example, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, Judy Seigel
  • Re: Paper negative, comparison to inkjet transparency, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: Paper negative, comparison to inkjet transparency, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Paper negative, comparison to inkjet transparency, Guido Ceuppens
• Paper Nrgatives, John Grocott
  • Re: Paper Nrgatives, Andrea Zalme
• Photoshop CS3 10.0.1 Update breaks printing on Epson roll paper, Editor, P.O.V. Image Service
• Christina's Suggestion re Gelatine replacing Gum, John Grocott
• Strength of bleach, John Grocott
  • Re: Strength of bleach, Loris Medici
    • Carbon Printing, Sandy King
    • Re: Strength of bleach, Loris Medici
• Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Andrea Zalme
  • RE: Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Dave Soemarko
    • Re: Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Andrea Zalme
      • RE: Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Dave S
  • Re: Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: Paper Negatives and Alt Process, Andrea Zalme
• Re: Moonrise - Mamaroneck (off-topic), Charles Ewen
• Re: Bleach-development with gum, Katharine Thayer
  • Paper negative example (was: Bleach-development with gum), Katharine Thayer
    • RE: Paper negative example (was: Bleach-development with gum), Dave Soemarko
      • Re: Paper negative example (was: Bleach-development with gum), Katharine Thayer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Marek Matusz
    • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
  • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
    • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Bleach-development with gum recipe, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, ryberg
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, ryberg
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Katharine Thayer
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum recipe, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Marek Matusz
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, sam wang
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Judy Seigel
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Katharine Thayer
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Five Stages to Javelle Gum Print, John Grocott
      • Re: Five Stages to Javelle Gum Print, Loris Medici
      • Re: Five Stages to Javelle Gum Print, Katharine Thayer
    • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Christina Z. Anderson
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Keith Gerling
  • RE: Bleach-development with gum, zphoto@montana.net
  • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Ender100
  • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Ender100
    • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
  • RE: Bleach-development with gum, Marek Matusz
    • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Loris Medici
      • Re: Bleach-development with gum, Katharine Thayer
• Re: Some recent publications about carbon transfer, Sandy King
  • RE: Some recent publications about carbon transfer, Dave Soemarko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Some recent publications about carbon transfer, Ender100
  • RE: Some recent publications about carbon transfer, Judy Seigel
    • RE: Some recent publications about carbon transfer, Sandy King