RE: archivalness of gum

[Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>]

I posted another message after the previous one, but it hasn't arrived. It
should be arriving any minute now.


Dave  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Gauvreau [mailto:gauvreau-yves@cgocable.ca] 
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 12:55 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Re: archivalness of gum
> 
> Is it the same for gelatin?
> 
> Yves
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave S" <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 12:47 PM
> Subject: RE: archivalness of gum
> 
> 
> > Yes, but since gum arabic has been used in painting, the 
> archivalness 
> > of
> it
> > has gone through time test for a long time, from hundreds 
> to thousands 
> > of years.
> >
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yves Gauvreau [mailto:gauvreau-yves@cgocable.ca]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 12:13 PM
> > > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> > > Subject: Re: archivalness of gum
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Out of curiosity, wouldn't it be appropriate to also consider the 
> > > gelatin and/or whatever else is used with the pigment(s) in the 
> > > archivalness equation?
> > >
> > > Yves
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>