RE: archivalness of gum

[Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>]

Oh yes, I understood what you meant. There is no need for clarification, but
thanks anyway.  :-)


Dave  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com] 
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:17 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Re: archivalness of gum
> 
> 
> On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Katharine Thayer wrote:
> 
> >
> > Myself, I consider gum quite archival; the only thing I'm 
> objecting to 
> > here is categorical pronouncements based purely on speculation.
> > Katharine
> >
> >
> 
> Clarification:  Dave, the last sentence didn't refer to 
> anything in your post; I was thinking more of the attempts to 
> rank processes by archivality. 
> 
>