RE: aquapel

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: aquapel
From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:02:39 -0500 (EST)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <BAY133-W285EA7213BC5C0272FE1C6BB520@phx.gbl>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <006201c84d63$458a6d20$a15dc844@christinsh8zpi><BAY133-W285EA7213BC5C0272FE1C6BB520@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca


On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Marek Matusz wrote:

Chris,
Buxton paper for platinum prining is (was sized) with Aquapel. I never tried it for gum. I only bought one sheet to try and at $10/sheet I decided it was not worth the money for me.
Marek

Now this is a reach, but... in case memory serves .. the aquapel was IN the mix, of the Buxton, not on top of it, which would be a totally different thing. In fact I used Buxton for gum printing, and it surely needed both preshrinking and sizing, at least for multiple coating.

J.

References:
- aquapel
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- RE: aquapel
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>