Re: View Camera

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: View Camera
From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:19:38 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <1202239772.47a8b91c356e7@webmail.iquest.net>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <BAYC1-PASMTP06B5C7898E2939B86EE245DA330@CEZ.ICE><006a01c8673b$97414e30$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><200802040959.24590.gordon.holtslander@usask.ca><00a601c86808$32265860$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><a0602042bc3ce32921fb8@[192.168.1.104]><1202239772.47a8b91c356e7@webmail.iquest.net>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Jim,

Yes, Kodak did not put a UV coating in the emulsion as they did with TMAX-100 so TMY-2 will work fine with alternative processes.

Sandy

At 2:29 PM -0500 2/5/08, jstrain@iquest.net wrote:

Sandy - Will TMY - 2 transmit UV light so that we can continue to use it for
pt/pd printing?  Thx.  Jim

Quoting Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>:

 To any interested parties.

<snip>>

 I will also have a technical article in the next issue (March/April)
 in which test the new TMY-2 film and compare it to the old emulsion.
 In fact, the article  has already been posted in the Subscriber
 section of View Camera.

 Sandy King

References:
- problem
  - From: david drake <daviddrakephoto@sympatico.ca>
- Re: problem
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: problem
  - From: "Gordon J. Holtslander" <gordon.holtslander@usask.ca>
- Re: problem
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- View Camera
  - From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
- Re: View Camera
  - From: jstrain@iquest.net