U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | MORE LENOX REDUX

MORE LENOX REDUX


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: MORE LENOX REDUX
  • From: BOB KISS <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:54:13 -0400
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAIsdeRRYKtgRkfoAENz0NV7CgAAAEAAAAMb209n86jVAvKG5uTqEeiYBAAAAAA==@caribsurf.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAIsdeRRYKtgRkfoAENz0NV7CgAAAEAAAAMb209n86jVAvKG5uTqEeiYBAAAAAA==@caribsurf.com>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Thread-index: AciIcGYm3dqlGHSeT+i9ZKotwlIVXwBV+Iwg

DEAR LIST,
	Another observation:
	Though I store my COT 320, Crane's Platinotype, and Lenox in the
same place and conditions and all are nearly the same age, the Lenox drinks
nearly 50% more coating solution than the other papers.  Cheaper paper, more
expensive to use!
	Also Lenox wet strength is less than the other two.
		CHEERS!
			BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: BOB KISS [mailto:bobkiss@caribsurf.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:50 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: LENOX REDOX

Or is that Lenux redux?  
	Either way, I have just tested some Lenox paper (which I have had
for years) for PT/PD printing.  I used Lenox many years ago but since I have
used Cranes Platinotype (until it went south) and COT 320 which I still love
best.  The Lenox has given me some nice results.  Anyone still using it?  It
is very reasonably priced.

		CHEERS!
			BOB

 Please check my website: http://www.bobkiss.com/  

"Live as if you are going to die tomorrow.  Learn as if you are going to
live forever".  Mahatma Gandhi



__________ NOD32 2953 (20080317) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



  • References: