Re: LC-1 developer question

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: LC-1 developer question
From: ryberg <cryberg@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:22:37 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <BAYC1-PASMTP01C8EB4E937340EBDDBE06DAFE0@CEZ.ICE><20080327.120919.110872413.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org><BAYC1-PASMTP04C4644C5470F987E35719DAFE0@CEZ.ICE><20080327.150618.167158636.lifebook-4234377@silvergrain.org>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Some years ago I used LC-1 as formulated and got excellent results. I suspect that double strength will not give you better results and, as you have found, will give you problems. Charles Portland OR

References:
- LC-1 developer question
  - From: david drake <daviddrakephoto@sympatico.ca>
- Re: LC-1 developer question
  - From: Ryuji Suzuki <rs@silvergrain.org>
- Re: LC-1 developer question
  - From: david drake <daviddrakephoto@sympatico.ca>
- Re: LC-1 developer question
  - From: Ryuji Suzuki <rs@silvergrain.org>