RE: SPE and alt update
Keith, The BFK is not as bad as I thought. Thanks! Now where could I store it? Not under the bed, my wife would notice that one right off. Don -----Original Message----- From: Keith Gerling [mailto:keith.gerling@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:22 PM To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Re: SPE and alt update I wish I could see her work. But I have to say that registration of large negatives is much easier that you might think. In fact, the larger the work, the less the eye notices small imperfections (which is one reason I print big) Here is a source for rolls of commonly used papers at pretty good prices: http://apps.webcreate.com/ecom/catalog/product_listing.cfm?ClientID=15&Categ oryFullID=229 On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Clay Harmon <wcharmon@wt.net> wrote: > I dunno. I have seen some papers available in that size, but maybe she is > just buying rolls and cutting it herself. It is daunting to think about > trying to register a negative on a print that large. And I can tell you that > her layers are definitely registered. Just flat out gorgeous work. > > Clay > > > On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Don Bryant wrote: > > > > Clay, > > > > > > > > > > > > Another tidbit I picked up from talking shop with her was that she is > > making her negatives for her 'small' prints (22x30!!!) using conventional > > film enlarged negatives. Only for her elephant sized prints (I think she > > said these were 44x30) does she use digital negatives. > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow! Where does one find paper large enough to print gum @ 44x30 inches? > > > > Don Bryant > > > > > > > > > > > >
|