Re: SPE and alt update
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: SPE and alt update
- From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:22:17 -0600
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;bh=HPCAMZ06tYGv+L6WM0Jda52FWKuIwGwTP+vNB2sP0IY=;b=gnJ4AYti224lfjGGuH+h7mgaZMGufXKSN4d7Pt0NFcVGVrKABTSCUbiFRzk0UDyl/0SbvmhVSzHHAoulmgT9hYR+JEw88c3S/Is07coPItHNquFIozRksTjiPn+C2VrvtMAHuuKBEt4iPWkvwWoOzL9C5XrNZ8CHijixEIbl6f4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=fQTt5itSUunTf2WhWanbJ/+A1VNpNo4C38Sp8u5Hctw8HT7cULnChKSwVPQQ+VIowRwt/KqFQnCao8rFB79uhqX2fuxhptlJiwYU35EfUcaWYcN2s6LGcRvz4figPK82D3xN3fnkgiZmIcpN449mEBr1i4/EPyE5r3b+DSG6lgM=
- In-reply-to: <CD53A3DC-7687-40E8-8AFA-73D79CAA651F@wt.net>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- References: <002101c89525$8a3b4d90$8801a8c0@athlon64><CD53A3DC-7687-40E8-8AFA-73D79CAA651F@wt.net>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
I wish I could see her work. But I have to say that registration of
large negatives is much easier that you might think. In fact, the
larger the work, the less the eye notices small imperfections (which
is one reason I print big)
Here is a source for rolls of commonly used papers at pretty good prices:
http://apps.webcreate.com/ecom/catalog/product_listing.cfm?ClientID=15&CategoryFullID=229
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Clay Harmon <wcharmon@wt.net> wrote:
> I dunno. I have seen some papers available in that size, but maybe she is
> just buying rolls and cutting it herself. It is daunting to think about
> trying to register a negative on a print that large. And I can tell you that
> her layers are definitely registered. Just flat out gorgeous work.
>
> Clay
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Don Bryant wrote:
>
>
> > Clay,
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > Another tidbit I picked up from talking shop with her was that she is
> > making her negatives for her 'small' prints (22x30!!!) using conventional
> > film enlarged negatives. Only for her elephant sized prints (I think she
> > said these were 44x30) does she use digital negatives.
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Wow! Where does one find paper large enough to print gum @ 44x30 inches?
> >
> > Don Bryant
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>