U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs

Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs



I just finished a roll of the 'utlra' premium, and I was glad to be done with it. I hated it. I am back to using the plain old 'premium'. The ultra premium had a milky translucent look to it, and the exposure times were about 33% longer than the regular stuff.

What is really weird is that I could never get the blackest black with this material. On my palladium prints made using the ultra stuff, any coated part of the print that was not under the film and was exposed directly to the light was always slightly, but discernibly darker. No matter what the exposure. My advice would be to stay away from it.

my 2 cents

Clay


On May 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Diana Bloomfield wrote:

Bob,

That's the downside-- Pictorico doesn't make this in 17x22, unfortunately. I can't figure out why they don't. I also used this other transparency that Don also recommended-- DAS. I'm not home now, so don't have the information, but it's Digital Art Supplies-- you can Google it. Their transparencies are also excellent, and they make it in the larger sizes. The price is comparable to Pictorico. I only buy the Pictorico Premium-- I'm not sure what the Ultra Premium does, but I'm sure somebody here has used it. It sure sounds better, doesn't it??

Diana
On May 21, 2008, at 10:47 AM, BOB KISS wrote:

DEAR DON, CHRIS, & DIANA,
Two more questions:
1) On the Pictorico web site I see Premium and Ultra Premium. What
is the difference and which to your recommend.
2) As I need to make 16X20 prints I need the 17X22 film but I don't
see if on the Pictorico site. Am I missing something?
CHEERS!
BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@montana.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:32 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs

Hi Bob,

I second Don. Pictorico is wonderful. It is now cheaper, too--20 sheets
for what used to be 15 in a packet of 8.5x11. I just finished a project that

required me to print about 140 negatives and I had nary a problem. And I
figure at $1 a sheet, that's only $3 per gum print and with all the time I
put into gum that isn't so big a deal.

Pictorico.com but I think Mitsubishi now owns it or something...
Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:50 AM
Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs


DEAR DON,
Thanks for the quick reply! A few questions:
1) Which of the two do you prefer, Pictorio or Inkpress?
2) From which supplier do you prefer to buy the Pictorio?
CHEERS!
BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bryant [mailto:dsbryant@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:39 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs

Bob,

Since price isn't a consideration go for Pictorico OHP. Or you may wish to
try Inkpress Transparency:

http://www.inkjetart.com/cart/press-transparency-film-c-1_753_937_986.html

Don Bryant



__________ NOD32 3116 (20080521) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





__________ NOD32 3116 (20080521) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com