From:
dan jones [mailto:cacadanebay@pacbell.net]
Sent: dinsdag 3 juni 2008 5:24
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Grainy Kallitype
david...
most of my prints are 5x7 and i am using 10 drops of each solution and applying
with a rod.
as i mentioned i was getting very good results and then the grain appeared. i
am in the los angeles area and i have been around 50% humidity in my work
area. perhaps i should try brushing on the coating (or trying 2 coats) and see
if that makes a difference...or perhaps there is a change in the paper stock...
the grain seems very even and there is no mottling
david drake
<daviddrakephoto@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I have had this problem with my Vandykes using Platine, whereas the
Stonehenge paper has always worked well under the same circumstances. I
have always thought that it was due to Platine needing more humidity to print.
I'm fairly sure that a higher humidity allows the paper to absorb more
sensitizer. Using too much sensitizer could also be problematic as the paper
isn't able to absorb all the sensitizer in areas, the area which are exposed on
the surface end up washing away in the clearing bath. This leaves a low dmax
mottled print which could be also said to be grainy.
Dan, how much sensitizer are you using and for what size of print?
Also, what is the Relative Humidity where you're working? I usually coat in a
room of around 60% humidity. This is apparently around optimum level for all
iron processes.
On 2-Jun-08, at 11:09 AM, dan jones wrote:
I have just started working with the process and have had a reasonable
amount of success so far. Today my prints started to get a very pronounced
grain pattern. the grain appeared with both digital and camera negatives.
Could this be related to humidity/dryness of the coated papers? Or could it be
a chemical (ferric oxalate) problem? No change in paper (stonhenge) or
developer (sodium citrate). Coated papers are air dried with a fan, no heat
applied.
Thanks
Dan
www.daviddrakephotography.com