U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Grainy Kallitype

RE: Grainy Kallitype


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: RE: Grainy Kallitype
  • From: dan jones <cacadanebay@pacbell.net>
  • Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net;h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;b=zdX+UwJEicZQN+KoqQCgp31uV7MK9bMVp+q5pgz3IPnU54OaLDBOq/Un0w4I5skl/wIuVDcN1hs8mxUKqP5l+mCSg+YTCxSQQUtTJEj3+FFy5L6zKhXQH72lK4ZrTcnlpkwsWL/RP0aOZq3j9UGJbZsqcKCdMwZQyxf7XA4yq2Q=;
  • In-reply-to: <B483E6169C2482499E1EA24D6F5F07DB0BD63D@maild.lumcnet.prod.intern>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

cor

thanks for your reply...i have tried it both with fresh and used...same result....

C.Breukel@lumc.nl wrote:
Dan,
 
Do you re-use your developer, or use it one-shot? (perhaps a stupid question, I did not do Kallitype for a long time)  If you re-use it perhaps try a fresh batch?
 
Best,
 
Cor
 

From: dan jones [mailto:cacadanebay@pacbell.net]
Sent: dinsdag 3 juni 2008 5:24
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Grainy Kallitype
 
david...
most of my prints are 5x7 and i am using 10 drops of each solution and applying with a rod.
as i mentioned i was getting very good results and then the grain appeared. i am in the los angeles area and i have been around 50% humidity  in my work area. perhaps i should try brushing on the coating (or trying 2 coats) and see if that makes a difference...or perhaps there is a change in the paper stock...
the grain seems very even and there is no mottling

david drake <daviddrakephoto@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I have had this problem with my Vandykes using Platine, whereas the  Stonehenge paper has always worked well under the same circumstances. I have always thought that it was due to Platine needing more humidity to print. I'm fairly sure that  a higher humidity allows the paper to absorb more sensitizer. Using too much sensitizer could also be problematic as the paper isn't able to absorb all the sensitizer in areas, the area which are exposed on the surface end up washing away in the clearing bath. This leaves a low dmax mottled print which could be also said to be grainy. 
Dan, how much sensitizer are you using and for what size of print? Also, what is the Relative Humidity where you're working? I usually coat in a room of around 60% humidity. This is apparently around optimum level for all iron processes. 
 
cheers
david
 
On 2-Jun-08, at 11:09 AM, dan jones wrote:


I have just started working with the process and have had a reasonable amount of success so far. Today my prints started to get a very pronounced grain pattern. the grain appeared with both digital and camera negatives.

Could this be related to humidity/dryness of the coated papers? Or could it be a chemical (ferric oxalate) problem? No change in paper (stonhenge) or developer (sodium citrate). Coated papers are air dried with a fan, no heat applied.

Thanks
Dan
 
david drake photography
www.daviddrakephotography.com