Re: gum question
Oh, I bet that made for a beautiful portrait. I guess I didn't know clay came in anything but brick red. That's all I've ever seen. I have, indeed, heard of pregnant women eating clay and dirt-- is that only in the South? This particular image I've been working with today is from a Diana camera. Of course, it's not sharp to begin with, but I was surprised at how well it did with that one coat. I'll take a picture of it and post when it dries. I added a yellow layer (after sizing it after that first coat). I wish I'd left it alone, but the yellow layer looks okay. I did make a few gum images from zone plates. Most were a disappointment--and, as you say, got kind of muddy or mush-like after a few layers-- but I'll attach one I really liked. A few people from the list have seen this already. I really loved it, but my gallery owner here saw it and said he was "underwhelmed." Worse yet, he was dismayed because it "didn't look like a photograph." I don't know. Maybe my standards have gone down, but after a lot of failures, this one seemed really successful, in comparison. I just liked the way the colors transitioned so smoothly, and my whites stayed white. Don't know how well this will come across on your screen. I took the photo of the print itself by window light with my digital camera, so take it for what it's worth. It really is pretty (in real life)-- or, at least, I like to think it is. This was with your zone plate cap, Sam, on my Canon 5D. I printed this on sized (w/ gelatin and glut for hardener) Fabriano Artistico. On Jun 7, 2008, at 7:57 PM, sam wang wrote: Yes, that was me. A painter friend who made his own oil paints gave me jars of pigments he made from clay around here. I think he had help from the chemistry department, at least in the finer filters. Some of these work beautifully in gum and I thought appropriate to do a portrait of my painter friend with the "local colors".
|