RE: Attachments
Beautiful flowers Dave. To shorten links you can use Tiny Url http://tinyurl.com/ which will solve the line break problem, an example http://tinyurl.com/67lenl John. -----Original Message----- From: Dave S [mailto:fotodave@dsoemarko.us] Sent: 27 June 2008 05:00 To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: RE: Attachments I have surely sent only once. My Outbox shows only one copy, but Outlook crashed and I restarted it. For some reason two copies went out. But I also found that the formatting put extra line feed to the link, so let me try again: http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action= view¤t=Solomon080418f.jpg http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action= view¤t=OrngSovr080401b.jpg http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action= view¤t=Minerva080406b.jpg If it still breaks each link into 2 lines, I don't know what else I can do. Maybe you can manually combine them. That is, of course, if you are interested at all. :-) Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave S [mailto:fotodave@dsoemarko.us] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:23 PM > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > Subject: RE: Attachments > > And also, nowadays it is so easy to setup an account with > some of the free photo-hosting sites like photobucket.com, > flicker.com, etc. The account is free and you can easily > register for one. > > I use Photobucket because it has an easy interface for > uploading pictures. > It also gives you easy copy-and-paste button that you can > click on your picture and generate links like these (but > other sites might provide the same thing too): > > http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar > yllis/?action= > view¤t=Solomon080418f.jpg > > http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar > yllis/?action= > view¤t=OrngSovr080401b.jpg > > http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar > yllis/?action= > view¤t=Minerva080406b.jpg > > These pictures also show my recent interest in plants and > hybridizing. I suppose I can make color gum bichromate prints > with them too later. I guess > it is nice to combine two hobbies. :-) > > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:46 PM > > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca > > Subject: Re: Attachments > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Bogdan Karasek wrote: > > > > > Hi Marek, > > > > > > The reason that attachements are not allowed on most lists (there > > > other camera lists I belong to don't allow them) is that > > attachements > > > are very convenient carriers of viriuses, or should that > be "virii"? > > > > Even aside from the virus issues, some of us prefer to give > our all to > > antique processes. Being merely super-human ourselves, we > have limited > > resources remaining for modern tech. For example, I do > e-mail in Pine > > on a Unix shell, which doesn't take attachments. If something seems > > crucial I can usually forward it to another server that will take > > attachments, but.... it's definitely a PITA. So an > attachment should > > be (or seem to be) really important... not just a routine scan of > > something inconsequenstial, or a "recent print", as is usually the > > case. > > > > Also, I think someone mentioned the strain it puts on the > facilities > > of our host in USASK... if everyone, or even several folks > did that, > > and then the attachment gets included in the replies.... > then in the > > replies to the replies, etc.... they might decide to kick us out ! > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1519 - Release Date: 6/25/2008 4:13 PM
|