RE: Attachments

[Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>]

I have surely sent only once. My Outbox shows only one copy, but Outlook
crashed and I restarted it. For some reason two copies went out.

But I also found that the formatting put extra line feed to the link, so let
me try again:

http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action=
view&current=Solomon080418f.jpg

http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action=
view&current=OrngSovr080401b.jpg

http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amaryllis/?action=
view&current=Minerva080406b.jpg


If it still breaks each link into 2 lines, I don't know what else I can do.
Maybe you can manually combine them. That is, of course, if you are
interested at all.  :-)



Dave  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave S [mailto:fotodave@dsoemarko.us] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:23 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: RE: Attachments
> 
> And also, nowadays it is so easy to setup an account with 
> some of the free photo-hosting sites like photobucket.com, 
> flicker.com, etc. The account is free and you can easily 
> register for one.
> 
> I use Photobucket because it has an easy interface for 
> uploading pictures.
> It also gives you easy copy-and-paste button that you can 
> click on your picture and generate links like these (but 
> other sites might provide the same thing too):
> 
> http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar
> yllis/?action=
> view&current=Solomon080418f.jpg
> 
> http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar
> yllis/?action=
> view&current=OrngSovr080401b.jpg
> 
> http://s274.photobucket.com/albums/jj258/MichiganDave1234/Amar
> yllis/?action=
> view&current=Minerva080406b.jpg
> 
> These pictures also show my recent interest in plants and 
> hybridizing. I suppose I can make color gum bichromate prints 
> with them too later. I guess
> it is nice to combine two hobbies.    :-)
> 
> 
> Dave  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:46 PM
> > To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> > Subject: Re: Attachments
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Bogdan Karasek wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > The reason that attachements are not allowed on most lists (there 
> > > other camera lists I belong to don't allow them) is that
> > attachements
> > > are very convenient carriers of viriuses, or should that 
> be "virii"?
> > 
> > Even aside from the virus issues, some of us prefer to give 
> our all to 
> > antique processes. Being merely super-human ourselves, we 
> have limited 
> > resources remaining for modern tech. For example, I do 
> e-mail in Pine 
> > on a Unix shell, which doesn't take attachments. If something seems 
> > crucial I can usually forward it to another server that will take 
> > attachments, but.... it's definitely a PITA. So an 
> attachment should 
> > be (or seem to be) really important... not just a routine scan of 
> > something inconsequenstial, or a "recent print", as is usually the 
> > case.
> > 
> > Also, I think someone mentioned the strain it puts on the 
> facilities 
> > of our host in USASK... if everyone, or even several folks 
> did that, 
> > and then the attachment gets included in the replies.... 
> then in the 
> > replies to the replies, etc.... they might decide to kick us out !
> > 
> > J.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>