Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
From: sam wang <stwang@clemson.edu>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:28:53 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <003101c8f400$33e8a0c0$8801a8c0@athlon64>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <fe10dd710808010919r4d090ad9p973b7911a68c77ca@mail.gmail.com><003101c8f400$33e8a0c0$8801a8c0@athlon64>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

How about this for alt? Grass grown under negatives:

But is it archival? I wonder what dpi negatives were used?

Sam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
  - From: Bogdan Karasek <bkarasek@videotron.ca>
- Re: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
  - From: ender100 <ender100@aol.com>

References:
- My first platinum prints - and I'm hooked
  - From: Edward Draper <ercdraper@gmail.com>
- Question about Arista II Transparency OHP media
  - From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>