Re: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
From: ender100 <ender100@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:30:27 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <94AD15F9-287A-4D47-89B3-C2E3BCF6D8B6@clemson.edu>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

could you use PDN?

On Aug 3, 2008, at 9:28:53 PM, "sam wang" <stwang@clemson.edu> wrote:

From: "sam wang" <stwang@clemson.edu>
Subject: Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
Date: August 3, 2008 9:28:53 PM CDT
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
How about this for alt? Grass grown under negatives:
http ://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/09/grass-art-displays-at-wimbledon/

But is it archival? I wonder what dpi negatives were used?

Sam

Best Wishes,

Mark Nelson

Precision Digital Negatives

PDN Print Forum @ Yahoo! Groups

Ma rk Nelson Photography

It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that make the grade on AOL Shopping.

References:
- Chlorophiltype, or is it Grassography
  - From: sam wang <stwang@clemson.edu>