U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: help identifying camera/film

Re: help identifying camera/film


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: help identifying camera/film
  • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:05:05 -0700
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327;d=ix.netcom.com;b=hb3hTAEMpLBJyIVxHOdTxqr4CNrMKSKt4nPc55TsDS4sSD5mLk6ilhgGoIIKNXND;h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <000501c8fc0d$17ce0050$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
  • Reply-to: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
  • Resent-date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:05:15 -0600 (CST)
  • Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
  • Resent-message-id: <20080812050515.E607413B69C@www.usask.ca>
  • Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca


----- Original Message ----- From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
To: "Alt List" <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:50 PM
Subject: help identifying camera/film


Dear all,

NOT alt related per se but what the heck, unless film is
"alt" now:

This probably serves no purpose but to satisfy my
curiosity.  I have been going through these old family pix
and have come across the camera that took a bunch of BW
negs I have from my family of origin.  Here are 3 shots of
what is the camera.  Does anyone know what camera this is
and what the "number" of film it took was?  It is
definitely roll film.

I put it on a page on my website called "Miscellaneous",
where I can post a pic or two every now and then for
discussion purposes, so the page is poorly done but oh
well...

http://christinaanderson.visualserver.com/Text_page.cfm?pID=2076
__________________

Christina Z. Anderson
http://christinaZanderson.com/
__________________
There is a list of Kodak folding cameras at:
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/consumer/products/techInfo/aa13/aa13.shtml

It shows the number of the film used but not the format
size. I have another publication from Kodak showing
discontinued roll film sizes, I will try to find it. I
originally got it from the web site of Thom Bell who was one
of Kodak's professional consultants. I don't think the web
site is there anymore.
Autographic cameras were originally intended to be used
with Autographic film. This film had a fiberous paper
backing which could be scratched away using a metal stylus
that came with the camera. There is a small window with a
flap on the back of the camera which allows writing on the
film. The scratched away areas exposed the emulsion leaving
the writing in the margin between pictures. A sort of early
data back. The system didn't work very well and was
discontinued after 1932. I think similar cameras but without
the window were made later than that. Autographic cameras
came in at least three sizes and non-autographic film was
made for all of them.
I have a No.3 Autographic but its much larger than the
camera in your pictures, I think it was the largest size
made. The film gate in mine measures 3-1/4 x 5-1/2, the
width of the film must have been about 3-3/4 inch from the
dimentions of the film channel. It was No. A-122.
If you can find a copy of McKeown's Guide at the library
you can probably identify it exactly.

Also check out http://www.nwmangum.com/Kodak/ which has pictures and some info an a lot of Kodak cameras. However beware because he evidently does not know the difference between f/stops and the old US stop system which was used by B&L for its Rapid-Rectilinear lenses supplied to Kodak for many years after it was obsolete. I've written to him about this, probably will go in the round file.


---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com