Re: Thanks Keith (my hero!) Re: Gum on masa, again
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Thanks Keith (my hero!) Re: Gum on masa, again
- From: Keith Gerling <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:53:07 -0500
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;bh=mlYRAzqGIVmYdfjITBvFyTL3z3ZFBSov5C7rEx319g8=;b=LOLk+09bU4i31sdZ/+IAALL+zxWXco52sR04DFSNgv0hQ39OWfrKp0gQT3ViZdHrl4Gekud466uf/1NLgLusuWVGbHJpFHk7lpQJfvt7gaDfIlZAoXvrp8RDM3tIGk/jzSghzGaqxhwjRaoXADRfeHfPosMRpysnfKwO7SNzx+A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references;b=qWv4sbAwBdsWK7AOOQwE7iBvyVx78HgMw30WZp6Wq9ludJnc2y7evPwTSkytg5P5dPjb6PWF2OqReSGE0k9ffRPaWx/tGYuYFJibWp5OoS8XeJTr8xNeoL6+qRQ/JJh2gsLqYvhTwtQl9M9B2d9w3x5AfjaFheEfax8o/EC3024=
- In-reply-to: <72EEC8A8-E1CA-4070-82AF-C6BF66B78A2A@pacifier.com>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <email@example.com>
- References: <3EC3760E-B120-4DDB-9DF6-00AB18C36262@pacifier.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><72EEC8A8-E1CA-4070-82AF-C6BF66B78A2A@pacifier.com>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
Wow, a Hero! Glad it worked.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Katharine Thayer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Okay, I've had to introduce some slight variations, since I don't use trays
> but sinks, and can't rock the sinks. What I'm doing is setting the half
> sheet of coated and printed paper on a sheet of 16x20 mylar and introducing
> it into the water, face up, supported by the mylar sheet. I can't seem to
> stop myself from swishing the print around to wash the dichromate out
> before leaving it in the water to develop, face up, but as long as the paper
> is supported by the mylar as I wash waves of water over it, it seems to be
> fine. I leave the mylar sheet under it; it fairly quickly settles to the
> bottom, but when I want to wash some more water across, I just bring the
> mylar up under it. Then when it's time to take the print out, I bring it
> out supported by the mylar, as Keith suggested. Works like a charm; three
> prints on half sheets so far, and not a crease in sight. I'm still trying
> to get the hang of coating the stuff though; my usual coating mix doesn't
> work well at all and I have to keep adding more and more water to get it to
> coat nicely, and then I'm not pleased with the tonality with the added
> water. But those are details, not obstacles.
> I've used my last sheet of sized paper, so will have to size more before
> experimenting further, but just wanted to thank Keith for his comments and
> suggestions. Very helpful, thank you.
> On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Keith Gerling wrote:
>> I find masa extremely difficult to handle when wet. I usually "scoop"
>> it out of the water - developing it face up - with a sheet of aluminum
>> or plexiglass, hang it up clinging to the support, and then peel the
>> print off of the support after it has dried a little. Certainly it is
>> understandable that you would get creases.
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Katharine Thayer <email@example.com>
>>> Well, folks, I've been tearing my hair out trying to print on this paper,
>>> and it's not working well for me at all. I've re-read the latest
>>> on the subject, and I don't see anywhere anyone mentioning the problem
>>> is making the paper impossible for me. I've adjusted my coating mix to
>>> requirements so it coats okay, though the paper tends to go wavy as it
>>> absorbs the coating, and it prints fine, but the thing that ruins prints
>>> me is that when the paper gets wet through, it becomes very fragile; any
>>> disturbance of the paper (gently picking up an edge to look at how it's
>>> developing, etc) opens a crease, almost a tear, that tends to run
>>> diagonally across the print but can go in any direction, and there can be
>>> more than one of them. Does this happen to no one but me? Do you use a
>>> screen or something to support the paper in the water, the way one would
>>> with a delicate Japanese paper?
>>> Someone suggested that being such a cheap paper, maybe there are large
>>> inconsistencies between batches so that none of us are actually using the
>>> same paper, which would explain why people have such different
>>> with it. Keith recently suggested that "there are a few interesting
>>> surprises that await those who are willing to experiment" with this
>>> is this one of them? If so, I'm not delighted.