U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Carbon Prints and NuArc

RE: Carbon Prints and NuArc

Title: Carbon Prints and NuArc

We use a Nuarc here all the time. Works as well as the DaiNippon and Olecs. It'd almost as fast as the DaiNippon 4000 watt and not as fast as the Olec 5000 watter. It covers a much smaller area so is pretty fast.


--Dick Sullivan


From: Daniel Williams [mailto:dtwilliams3@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:42 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Carbon Prints and NuArc



I don't do carbon so don't have an answer for you.  If you don't get an answer here you might want to ask over at the carbon forum at Bostick and Sullivan's

Dan Williams

Cathy Cakebread wrote:

Hmmm… no response, how about: has anyone used a NuArc with the pre-made tissues?

Thanks - Cathy


From: Cathy Cakebread [mailto:cathyc@cathycakebread.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:00 PM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Carbon Prints and NuArc



I plan on making my own tissues and wish to use my NuArc to do the exposures.

Has anyone done this? If yes, what approximate units did you use?

For my platinum/palladium prints using the same negatives (using Pictorico film) and NuArc, I usually use 56 units.

I use either PDN or QTR to create negatives.

Thanks - Cathy