Re: Pond-moonrise (was: Re: Steichen image in April's 'Vanity Fair'
Actually, I'm seeing that disclaimer on many of his gum over works at the museum site.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Katharine Thayer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Pond-moonrise (was: Re: Steichen image in April's 'Vanity Fair'
On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Katharine Thayer wrote:Hmm, maybe you haven't caught up with the rest of the discussion; the print in the Chicago show was from the Met's collection, the middle print on the page I posted, the one that looks just brown in the jpeg. I doubt the jpeg (from the Met's site) does it justice, but it's interesting how little the present reproduction matches past descriptions of the print.Something interesting to note is the highlighted banner at the top of the Met's page for this print: "This information may change as the result of ongoing research." When I first saw it, I assumed it was just a standard banner they have on all their images, but I don't see it on other pages, so maybe this particular print is undergoing particular scrutiny just now. It seems unlikely that the brown tone is just really poor scanning techniques on their part, so what I fear is that the pigments he used to stain the print were not permanent and have faded over time.