Re: BL light box 'blues'
Then I stand corrected on that, Kerik....hen it could have been the combo of tmax and pyro and perhaps cyano??? I'll have to check my notes, as I am still in Dallas. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerik" <kerik@kerik.com> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:39 PM Subject: RE: BL light box 'blues' Christina said:Ken, Pyro negs, as well as Tmax 100 film, do not work for UV processes...Um, well, just about every in-camera negative I've ever printed in pt/pd/gum for the last 19 years has been processed in PMK or Rollo Pyro (not Pyrocat). I have a BL-tube box with 12 4-ft 40 watt tubes about 2-1/2 inches above the contact frame. My exposure times are typically in the 4 to 8 minute range. So, it definitely works for me. Very, very well in fact. As for TMAX 100, yep, it's basically UV bulletproof. Kerik www.kerik.com
|