Re: argentotype again

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: argentotype again
From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:53:42 +0200
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <00fb01c9daae$85860f90$0200a8c0@xxx3973844ccd4>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <20090520075647.19407.qmail@webmaildh4.aruba.it><COL116-W43F38922FE8B5FB7230BCDBB590@phx.gbl><20090521055355.16004.qmail@webmaildh6.aruba.it><COL116-W607232B1D73EC8F1181CB6BB560@phx.gbl><00fb01c9daae$85860f90$0200a8c0@xxx3973844ccd4>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Stane Kocar wrote:

USPO 1.120.580 - Sensitive photographic paper and process of making the same. Patented Dec. 8, 1914.
Is this the right one?

Yes, and GB 20,002 (1913) "Improvements in or relating to Photographic Printing and Paper therefor". Curiously, the European Patent Office does not retrieve the corresponding US patent asking for the INPADOC patent family.
Alberto

References:
- argentotype again
  - From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
- RE: argentotype again
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: argentotype again
  - From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
- RE: argentotype again
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: argentotype again
  - From: Stane Kocar <stane.kocar@siol.net>