Re: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question
From: Jeremy Moore <jeremydmoore@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:48:18 -0500
Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;bh=Tqbbq/eBz+DKNDZ0cz8D/fe9rUFwyaIXIGPVA6EHO9M=;b=hwZ5N9MdOpt9MXQTK6Y/y3o6TN1Z2O+wOoc7G1SiuL4KBgEzMfE+mA1nm24gSwxlNQ3aLcXEhaBzCp5zFUUPVyREs1NpwVQPXy6sk7s17galbNpTgcC/MSnZcw7OupdeOsa3svSkkV+uTga2uHXXIAr+P7xIgK0vmzrWYoqOHWU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;b=GIjcXGnZQ3vGJurOkiQZ9i0xR4GilikRUS81qFVseCu/SPzal8aamad9Z0GZ3nCw8utyfKST1BX/I+eeMPSCimG7kKGsahQh/Em9Rv28Y6myDZLzX2Wu14pzPneRnnu4I1LPTelsbFgVKEHHc5632IeQk5RtawopGNwpXYgGifg=
In-reply-to: <003d01ca4952$f290eb10$7000a8c0@dell4600>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <4ACF832A.4090904@tomkershaw.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0910091526370.2815@panix1.panix.com><COL116-W17FF9C155C3BA85D663204BBCB0@phx.gbl><725fa8580910091348o15f2fab1m61c6d6062c95751a@mail.gmail.com><4ACFBBFE.2060703@web.de> <002601ca4933$5d1a60d0$7000a8c0@dell4600><4ACFD184.1070500@web.de> <003d01ca4952$f290eb10$7000a8c0@dell4600>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

It's one of my favorite papers for the combination of those two processes! It also responds quite well to Gamblin PVA Size at 1:1 (haven't tried it at 1:2 because I like the extra sheen on the velvety paper from 1:1).

Clay Harmon had a great post on his full plate blog about printing palladium on BFK Rives, but I can't seem to find it at the moment so I need to do some searching for it.

-Jeremy-

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net> wrote:

Hi all...

I was given a package of this paper (don't think it's the heavyweight version) and was wondering if anyone prefers the "back" side which is smoother than the watermarked side...?

I thought I might try it in both processes, just for fun...

Paul

References:
- Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Tom Kershaw <tom@tomkershaw.com>
- Re: Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Miracle size for gum
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
- Rives BFK for pt/pd and gum question
  - From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net>