Re: Gum tonal range (was Miracle size for gum)

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum tonal range (was Miracle size for gum)
From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:51:32 -0700
Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <E38BE63E-2A54-46FC-A482-707AFC20BD19@pacifier.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <4ACF832A.4090904@tomkershaw.com><Pine.NEB.4.64.0910091526370.2815@panix1.panix.com><30210ED039F04FB9986C5170A5A848DF@DC5YX7B1><COL116-W146BF55A1E4B86CE6F505CBBCA0@phx.gbl><725fa8580910101047u77ebee94y9ca65b33a897ee79@mail.gmail.com><10EB87135F5E481E9F2CD4B315C6EE1B@DC5YX7B1> <4AD0E840.4050406@web.de><E38BE63E-2A54-46FC-A482-707AFC20BD19@pacifier.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Katharine Thayer wrote:

I have an example on my site of the same pigment (PBk11 --iron oxide black) printed at six different pigment concentrations, with a table showing the measured densities of the lightest and darkest values in the print.

Link if anyone's interested:

http://www.pacifier.com/~kthayer/html/tonality.html

References:
- Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Tom Kershaw <tom@tomkershaw.com>
- Re: Post factory photography back issues?
  - From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- RE: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
- Re: Miracle size for gum
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
- Re: was Miracle size for gum now tonal range
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: was Miracle size for gum now tonal range
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
- Re: Gum tonal range (was Miracle size for gum)
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>