[Alt-photo-process-list] Re: Few points about the new list...
mail at loris.medici.name
Fri Dec 4 20:43:04 GMT 2009
Sure, it definitely helps in the process of identifying the source.
But there are other ways (noted by Richard K. also, such as filtering
/ organizing / tagging by sender address and such), the original list
was working well w/o subject prefix... Couldn't we shorten it a little
bit, at least? (Something like [alt-p] maybe?) It's really too long
now; we loose exactly 25 characters in the subject; that makes
something a little more than 1/3 line...
2009/12/4 ender100 <ender100 at aol.com>
> I agree. I like having Alt Process List in the header too so that I can distinguish quickly the source.
> Best Wishes,
> Mark Nelson
> Precision Digital Negatives
> PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
> Mark Nelson Photography
> On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:02:16 PM, Productions <productions at johnesimmons.com> wrote:
> From:Productions <productions at johnesimmons.com>
> Subject:[Alt-photo-process-list] Re: Few points about the new list...
> Date:December 4, 2009 12:02:16 PM CST
> alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> I get the txt message with html in Thunderbird
> I like the [Alt-photo-process-list] in the header - keeps me from
> confusing it with spam
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list