[alt-photo] Re: New Platinum Prints

[Loris Medici]

BTW, to correct a mistake I've made in terminology: I was talking
about the exposure scale (ES) actually, not density range (DR)...
Sorry.

2010/4/11 Loris Medici <mail at loris.medici.name>:
> Indeed, the DR of the print-out pd process I use is something around
> log 2.9 for instance (can be stretched to > log 3.0 actually), and I
> also use digital negatives.
>
> 2010/4/11  <ender100 at aol.com>:
>> Etienne,
>>
>>
>> I print quite frequently with digital negatives and pure palladium—that has an exposure scale a couple stops above
>> log  2.4 you mentioned.  Most people I know using digital negatives don't use short scale pt/pd.
>