[alt-photo] Re: Another tricolor...

ender100 at aol.com ender100 at aol.com
Tue Jun 8 05:00:54 GMT 2010


oh go on Paul, let's see some worms! hehehehe





-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Viapiano <viapiano at pacbell.net>
To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 1:39 pm
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Another tricolor...


Thanks everyone for all the comments... 
 
But regarding casts and true color, etc...I mean, geez, these are only jpgs here, taken with a digital camera and white-balanced to match the actual print as best I can, and the print is going to look a little different than the online representation. But that being said, my online reps are pretty dang close. 
 
Oh, and don't forget that hardly any browsers (maybe Safari) recognize color profiles in individual photographs, therefore will render in a default sRGB mode. Even if you convert to that mode in PS, and a few other esoteric twists, your photograph will NEVER look the same online as your original does in PS....but let's not even enter that can of worms ;-) 
 
p 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- From: "Loris Medici" <mail at loris.medici.name> 
To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list" <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:16 AM 
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Another tricolor... 
 
> Thank you very much for the elaborate clarification Katharine. 
> 
> I'm sure Paul got what I had meant... 
> 
> Regards, 
> Loris. 
> 
> 
> 2010/6/7 Katharine Thayer <kthayer at pacifier.com>: 
>> Well, interesting the assumptions we base our judgments on. 
>> ... 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo  
_______________________________________________ 
Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo 

 



More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list