[alt-photo] Re: Another tricolor...

[Katharine Thayer]

No disagreement here, in fact that's what I said, that one shouldn't  
draw conclusions about color cast from an electronic reproduction.  I  
was simply responding to the criticism that the image had a blue  
cast, which I don't think is a valid criticism; I sure don't see any  
blue cast there.   Is all I was sayin.'




On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Paul Viapiano wrote:

> Thanks everyone for all the comments...
>
> But regarding casts and true color, etc...I mean, geez, these are  
> only jpgs here, taken with a digital camera and white-balanced to  
> match the actual print as best I can, and the print is going to  
> look a little different than the online representation. But that  
> being said, my online reps are pretty dang close.
>
> Oh, and don't forget that hardly any browsers (maybe Safari)  
> recognize color profiles in individual photographs, therefore will  
> render in a default sRGB mode. Even if you convert to that mode in  
> PS, and a few other esoteric twists, your photograph will NEVER  
> look the same online as your original does in PS....but let's not  
> even enter that can of worms ;-)
>
> p
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loris Medici"  
> <mail at loris.medici.name>
> To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list" <alt- 
> photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:16 AM
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Another tricolor...
>
>
>
>> Thank you very much for the elaborate clarification Katharine.
>>
>> I'm sure Paul got what I had meant...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Loris.
>>
>>
>> 2010/6/7 Katharine Thayer <kthayer at pacifier.com>:
>>
>>> Well, interesting the assumptions we base our judgments on.
>>> ...
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>
>