[alt-photo] Re: Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol 453, Issue 1
Richard Knoppow
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jul 22 17:28:24 GMT 2011
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christina Anderson" <zphoto at montana.net>
To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list"
<alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 8:40 AM
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol
453, Issue 1
> Well, it is was so hot here in MN that my wood floors
> which are atop a cold basement in this almost 100-year old
> house were wet. No air conditioning here.
> But the heat finally broke, sort of.
> I remember when I moved to South Carolina for grad school,
> I was shocked to find out the water came out of the
> faucets bathtub temp. I had never even thought that
> occurred, always having lived in northern climes where the
> well water or city water pipes were buried deep in the
> ground and hence water was always 55 degrees or so.
> To keep it on topic, when I first started using Maco
> Infrared film, that emulsion was so soft that it would
> ding and slough in the 70's. Had to always be careful to
> keep the developing temp low with that film.
> Chris
>
> Christina Z. Anderson
> christinaZanderson.com
Allowable processing temperatures have gone up
considerably over the years. Up to about 1940 the "standard"
temperature was 65F, then it was increased to 68F. Not a big
difference but it showed the progress in emulsion hardness
of the time. Emulsion frilling, reticulation, and grain
migration due to emulsion swelling were common problems. I
think we have stepped backwards with some of the current
films made by small companies who don't have or can't apply
the technology developed by the big guys.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list