[alt-photo] Re: Palladium Failures

eric nelson emanphoto at gmail.com
Sat Oct 1 14:59:03 GMT 2011

Hi Paul, Yes they are.  The Cot is direct from Bergger, bought a few weeks
ago and the Platine tests were made on samples provided by B&S in the same
time frame.  I just ordered some of that batch from B&S which I may regret
if unworkable.

I forgot to mention I had done a couple tests with 1 drop of Tween 20 10%
solution in a drop schedule of 13-3-16Pd on the same 10"x12" sized paper,
and the blacks are marginally better but still on the verge of solarizing.
That test is here and is 5
in exposure than the other tests in my first post.

Re:Mark's comment on contamination...  The other day I accidently left the
brush in the edta/sulfite bath overnight.  This cleaned the stains from the
brush nicely, but would that be considered 'contaminated' after a good

Message: 19
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:20:51 -0700
From: "Paul Viapiano" <viapiano at pacbell.net>
To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list"
       <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Palladium Failures
Message-ID: <6D04916400904549856638E0D9FE753B at dell4600>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";

Is this from the new batch of Platine...? Or new Cot 320...?

More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list