[alt-photo] Re: Densitometer (was: an alternative to alternative)
G Schmitz
coldbay1 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 1 09:44:54 GMT 2012
Alan,
Don't limit yourself to X-rite. There are lots of good units around and
last time I checked (about 3 years ago) ESCO was still supporting the
units they sold ;unlike MacBeth (now owned by Gretag and previously
owned by Kollmorgen) and X-rite which I don't think gives two hoots
about their old products.
Currently my primary densitometer (digital, reflection / transmission
with 2 color channels: Status A and Status M) is an ESCO TR-90M - a
wonderful tool.
For 20 years I used, exclusively, an analog MacBeth TD-500 transmission
densitometer for reading my B&W negs. What a great tool. The downside
to this unit is that it was designed for the printing industry and will
not read colors accurately. I still have it but only use it as a
reference to old data.
I also own a MacBeth TD-903. This unit is a color transmission unit,
digital, and very accurate. I spent big bucks to install a new set of
color filters. Don't know if anyone is doing this kind of maintaince
anymore. Mark Jackson, at Process Camera replaced the filters and
calibrated it for me in 2003.
Good luck. --greg
On 2012-03-31 17:51 PM, Dave S (fotodave) wrote:
> PS: If I remember correctly, I have an 810, and it worked very nicely for
> me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
> Dave S (fotodave)
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:50 PM
> To: 'The alternative photographic processes mailing list'
> Subject: [alt-photo] Densitometer (was: an alternative to alternative)
>
> I don't remember the model numbers, but in short, you want transmittance
> measurement (most densitometers do) and color mode (because you are
> interested in blue density). Reflective measurement would be nice too but
> not absolutely necessary.
>
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
> Alan MacKellar
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:16 PM
> To: 'The alternative photographic processes mailing list'
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: an alternative to alternative
>
> I have just attended a PDN workshop by Mark Nelson. He used an x-Rite
> densitometer, which was much faster and more accurate than scanning,
> averaging, and measuring 0-255 Photoshop zones.
>
> I have googled used X-Rite densitometers and found many on the market,
> especially Ebay, but I'm totally confused about what the model is that I
> need to use for PDN.
>
> Can anyone out there help me?
>
> Alan
> amackellar at qx.net
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list