[alt-photo] Re: an alternative to alternative

Kurt Nagy kakarott76 at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 31 19:19:25 GMT 2012


I use alt or alternative process.  

Like mentioned before, alt process was used to separate standard silver gelatin and color from some of the older processes.  With digital being the primary process nowadays, I think the only thing that may happen is traditional b/w and color will move into being an alt process along side everything else that isn't digital.

You could further categorize older alt processes like gum bichromate, wet collodion and cyanotype into something Like "historic process" (someone else already suggested this)  but why do we need to?



On Mar 31, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Christina Anderson <zphoto at montana.net> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> A philosophical question that I probably won't formulate well:
> 
> I've been having this discussion lately about the use of the word "alternative" in alt. The question is, alternative to what? Also, that it is an outmoded word. It doesn't mean anything. It has other connotations today. It pigeonholes us and isn't popular with gallerists. We are no longer "alternative" to the Big Yellow Brother as Kodak is bankrupt and anything goes nowadays. Etc. etc.
> 
> We just went through this ridiculous process of common course numbering at our university so that courses are named and numbered the same across the state if the course taught is the same. My course is now called "Alternative Photographic Techniques." because I couldn't come up with anything pithy, although I wanted it to be Contact Printing Processes.
> 
> The question: is what term are you using, or does "alt" continue to be sufficient? I thought what better group to ask than 500 alt listers.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Christina Z. Anderson
> christinaZanderson.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> 


More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list