[alt-photo] Re: Texas Chrysotype

[C.Breukel at lumc.nl]

Interesting new approach, although I must say that I am underwhelmed by the presented prints, the look flat and grey, and coating was not optimal on some.

I do hope it is digital representation, and that the prints are much nicer in real.

Did anybody actually had these prints in hands?

Best,

Cor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org [mailto:alt-
> photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of EJ Photo
> Sent: donderdag 24 mei 2012 0:56
> To: 'The alternative photographic processes mailing list'
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Texas Chrysotype
> 
> And what are your impressions? Did you do Chrysotype before? Ware Method?
> 
> Eric Neilsen
> Eric Neilsen Photography
> 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
> Dallas, TX 75226
> 
> www.ericneilsenphotography.com
> skype me with ejprinter
> Let's Talk Photography
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf
> Of
> JoeSarff at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:22 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Texas Chrystotype
> 
> There is an article in the last issue of View Camera describing the
> process
>  in detail.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo