[alt-photo] Re: Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol 722, Issue 1

[andy schmitt]

Richard
When Karen & I were in Madrid, we had out portrait done by a street
photographer who was certainly not using direct positive paper. 
The image she took was processed in the camera, dried moderately and
rephotographed by being placed into a holder a set distance from the camera.
It was also processed, washed(sort of) and dried off (sort of). She told me
to wash it out more in the sink when I got back to the hotel.
Since I had expressed so much interest in the process, she also gave me the
paper negative.
Pretty impressive, fast & it delivered an awfully nice image..
I've often thought about building one of those cameras out of a spare
8x10...
Regards
Andy Schmitt

============================================================================
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:41:08 -0700
From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk at ix.netcom.com>
To: "The alternative photographic processes mailing list"
	<alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: photobooth: photos delivered here in 2-1/2
	minutes
Message-ID: <2FC404CA83644FD988B8D1813B6EA56B at VALUED20606295>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original


     I am pretty sure these used direct-positive paper and probably worked
about like the street photographers cameras. 
The ones I remember from when I was a kid delivered sepia images which may
be a clue as to the process.  They were found in many places.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com 


------------------------------

******************************************************