[alt-photo] Re: Paper issues
Diana Bloomfield
dlhbloomfield at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 18:43:01 GMT 2013
It's really really nice, Paul-- probably the nicest paper I've ever used with pt/pd (aside from this vellum I bought from someone a long time ago that I'm hoarding). ;)
On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Paul Viapiano wrote:
> I'm looking forward to trying Magnani Revere with pt/pd. I've used Fab EW for a long time and love it, but it'd be nice to eliminate a pre-treat step.
>
> Paul
>
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Diana Bloomfield<dlhbloomfield at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not related to Strathmore-- but speaking of paper, I recently ordered some COT320. I was printing pt/pd on it, and the results were very grainy. I was using a digital negative, so I re-did the negative-- thinking that might be the problem. Still grainy. So I printed the same thing on Arches Platine-- no problem at all. I discovered an old sheet of COT320 I had, from a year or so ago-- and printed it on that. It was perfect. So-- this whole new batch of COT320 I got seems to be awful (for pt/pd). I don't know if this is a permanent change, or I just got a bad batch. It's very annoying when that happens. On the other hand, I had recently purchased this Magnani Revere paper and printed some pt/pd on it-- and it was really so so nice-- now my favorite paper for pt/pd. Haven't yet tried anything else on it.
>>
>> Diana
>>
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list