[alt-photo] Re: Paper issues

[Kerik Kouklis]

Ditto. The first batch of the heavyweight Revere was a disaster. The new
stuff is great.

-Kerik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org [mailto:alt-
> photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of Diana
> Bloomfield
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Paper issues
> 
> It's really really nice, Paul-- probably the nicest paper I've ever used
with
> pt/pd (aside from this vellum I bought from someone a long time ago that
I'm
> hoarding). ;)
> 
> 
> On Feb 9, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Paul Viapiano wrote:
> 
> > I'm looking forward to trying Magnani Revere with pt/pd. I've used Fab
EW
> for a long time and love it, but it'd be nice to eliminate a pre-treat
step.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Feb 9, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Diana Bloomfield<dlhbloomfield at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Not related to Strathmore-- but speaking of paper, I recently ordered
> some COT320.  I was printing pt/pd on it, and the results were very
grainy.  I
> was using a digital negative, so I re-did the negative-- thinking that
might be
> the problem.  Still grainy.  So I printed the same thing on Arches
Platine-- no
> problem at all.  I discovered an old sheet of COT320 I had, from a year or
so
> ago-- and printed it on that.  It was perfect.  So-- this whole new batch
of
> COT320 I got seems to be awful (for pt/pd).  I don't know if this is a
> permanent change, or I just got a bad batch.  It's very annoying when that
> happens.  On the other hand, I had recently purchased this Magnani Revere
> paper and printed some pt/pd on it-- and it was really so so nice-- now my
> favorite paper for pt/pd.  Haven't yet tried anything else on it.
> >>
> >> Diana
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo