[alt-photo] Re: Paper issues

Paul Viapiano viapiano at pacbell.net
Sat Feb 9 18:53:55 GMT 2013


Amy, I think that B & S only sells one type/finish of Magnani Revere. I'm not aware of another...

P

On Feb 9, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Amy Holmes George <amyhgeorge at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Diana,
> How bizarre that I actually encountered this same issue just today with COT 320! So, I too am wondering when and where you purchased your batch of "grainy" paper. At the moment, I am trying to figure that out myself. BTW, I have coated both sides of the paper--same result.
> Also, I'm curious to know which finish of Magnani Revere paper you have enjoyed good results with pt/pd.
> On a side note . . . while I don't regularly contribute to this list, I always try to stay up with it. And, it is amazing how many times I find that a discussion directly applies to some issue that I am currently struggling with. Many thanks to all who make this list so rich and informative :)
> Amy Holmes George
> 
>> From: dlhbloomfield at gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 11:40:16 -0500
>> To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
>> Subject: [alt-photo] Paper issues
>> 
>> Not related to Strathmore-- but speaking of paper, I recently ordered some COT320.  I was printing pt/pd on it, and the results were very grainy.  I was using a digital negative, so I re-did the negative-- thinking that might be the problem.  Still grainy.  So I printed the same thing on Arches Platine-- no problem at all.  I discovered an old sheet of COT320 I had, from a year or so ago-- and printed it on that.  It was perfect.  So-- this whole new batch of COT320 I got seems to be awful (for pt/pd).  I don't know if this is a permanent change, or I just got a bad batch.  It's very annoying when that happens.  On the other hand, I had recently purchased this Magnani Revere paper and printed some pt/pd on it-- and it was really so so nice-- now my favorite paper for pt/pd.  Haven't yet tried anything else on it.
>> 
>> Diana
>> 
>> On Feb 9, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Christina Anderson wrote:
>> 
>>> Eric,
>>> You, know, at first I was incredulous that a paper manufacturer would not correct this problem, but then I think it isn't meant for wet media I suppose. It sure does print beautiful tones in VDB.
>>> 
>>> In the past I've been a paper snob, only using 22x30 sheets of the usual suspects, but in the last couple years I have decided to buy the normal block pads at art stores to see if they are equally good. Last year was  mostly a disaster doing that with argyrotype so I was expecting the same this year with VDB (I try to alternate between kallitype, VDB, and argyrotype when teaching) but Canson and Strathmore pulled through as being great paper choices.
>>> 
>>> I usually have a stack of Fabriano Artistico HP, Crane's Cover, Weston, Arches Platine, and Cot 320 on hand at all times which for me covers all processes I might need to do, but none of these are common stock at smaller art stores.
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> Christina Z. Anderson
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo


More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list