[Alt-photo] Re: lith printing anomaly

Christina Anderson christinazanderson at gmail.com
Mon Oct 14 14:36:40 UTC 2013


Hi Kevin,
No, enlarger printed for the most part, although last year I started introducing the BW digineg in this Experimental Photography class just in case we have to end up going there permanently with the way of the world. Some students are thrilled and go straight digital with their work, maybe 5 of the 18. Other students think I have defected from analog as they are film all the way. Plus the class is based on Holga and pinhole work (although you can buy a Holga lens for a digital SLR too...). 
Chris

Christina Z. Anderson
http://christinaZanderson.com/

On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Kevin Morris wrote:

> Hi Christina,
> 
> What makes this hard to track down is how random is appears to be. I've seen
> similar spots on film occasionally and the closest we can figure is that
> they are a small cluster of silver in the emulsion that didn't smooth out
> properly during the coating process. But, that only happens on one sheet in
> maybe 800-1000 sheets of 8x10 film and that is only one spot (silver
> cluster). I've never seen it with paper, Ilford or Arista.
> 
> One question though. Are these prints being contact printed, maybe with a
> vacuum board?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Kevin Morris
> Stouffer Industries
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
> Christina Anderson
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:59 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> Subject: [Alt-photo] Re: lith printing anomaly
> 
> Hi Ryuji!
> The negative prints normally.
> The agitation technique was to pick up a corner of the tray and set it down
> and do it frequently and in an irregular way to avoid the wave effect that
> sometimes happens with lith. Lith development times were 10-20 minutes.
> The top print was 16x20 the bottom print was 8x10.
> Spots are in lights and darks.
> Second image is a woman standing with blonde hair.
> 
> This phenomenon happened with a number of students during the lab but not
> all. On a number of papers. And the second day it also occurred. The second
> day the student said the first two prints were fine, the third spotted. 
> 
> It is the weirdest thing I have ever seen. The only consistency is the
> Fotospeed Lith developer and perhaps the papers are all Arista and
> Ilford....there was one print from expired paper like Bergger that worked
> fine but so did all the papers at some point!
> Chris
> 
> Christina Z. Anderson
> http://christinaZanderson.com/
> 
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Ryuji Suzuki wrote:
> 
>> I might be asking the obvious, but
>> 
>> 1. does the neg print normally on the same paper stock when developed in a
> regular print developer?
>> 
>> 2. what was the agitation technique?
>> 
>> 3. what's the dimension of the print (or better yet the approximate
> diameter range of the white spots?)
>> 
>> 4. do you see any sign of the spots in the dark area?
>> 
>> Although irrelevant to your problem, I'm curious. What is the second image
> (below)?
>> 
>> --
>> Ryuji Suzuki
>> "Don't play what's there, play what's not there." (Miles Davis)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Christina Anderson wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> I posted a couple images on my website of a lith phenomenon I have never
> seen before. Anyone else experience this and figure it out?
>>> 
>>> Fotospeed Lith Developer
>>> Papers are Arista, Ilford MGIV, Ilford Warmtone, the middle one not
> suitable at all for lith but the students used it.
>>> 
>>> Tim Rudman thinks it could be erratic local development in the first
> stage with cause unknown.  He has not seen it much and suggests a controlled
> test of it.
>>> 
>>> This is the benefit of teaching. I never get bored seeing student work
> because after thousands and thousands of images to grade no two are alike.
> And I never get bored of teaching because there is always something to learn
> and something to stump you. But the poor students were pretty disappointed..
>>> 
>>> I hope lith is not another process to go by the wayside like Polaroid,
> Infrared, etc :( The former great papers are just not there anymore.
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://christinaanderson.visualserver.com/Text_page.cfm?pID=1953
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Christina Z. Anderson
>>> http://christinaZanderson.com/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org



More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list