I can't believe this "discussion"

Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:49:38 -0400 (EDT)

Well thanks to Klaus & Luis for jumping into this discussion with a dose
of reality, especially since the new listproc seems to hate me, really
hate me, because my messages are taking 24+ hours to arrive. But whenever
this truth bursts upon -- OK, I won't say the oblivious, because that
would be name-calling, I'll say the, um, unrealistic -- I feel compelled
to point out 3 obvious facts, before drawing my contributions on this
silly topic to a close:

1. If an independent researcher knew in advance that his or her
discoveries, if any, were slated to become instant "free knowledge," it is
highly unlikely that the discoveries would be pursued in the first place.
Few would or *could* devote a lifetime of labor with no expectation of
recompense. (How many major discoveries have been made by Rockefellers?)

2. Aside from the leap in magnitude from "gum bichromate by enlarger" to
"the cure for Aids," which is like comparing a flea bite to the collision
of galaxies, rest assured that whoever does discover the "cure for AIDS"
will be handsomely enriched -- and that is an understatement of galactal
proportions. I know well a few sufferers from AIDS and can attest that
such ameliorations as exist so far are *VERY* well recompensed to the
discoverers, the manufacturers, and their intermediaries, the doctors.

3. In no society, even the most pathologically utopian, is the wish to be
paid for labor considered "greed".

Judy