Re: Gum prints with the enlarger
Alan Kleiman (akleiman@infoabc.com)
Fri, 26 Apr 1996 17:35:17 -0500
>Received: from albeniz.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU by ns.infoabc.com via SMTP
(951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/940406.SGI)
> for <akleiman@infoabc.com> id AAA19269; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:28:00 -0500
>Received: From albeniz ([127.0.0.1]) By albeniz With Smtp ;
> Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:25:13 +1000
>From: Art Chakalis <achakali@freenet.columbus.oh.us>
>Sender: alt-photo-process@cse.unsw.edu.au
>To: Multiple recipients of list <alt-photo-process@cse.unsw.edu.au>
>Date: Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:25:11 +1000
>Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9604240142.A6077-a100000@acme>
>Errors-To: stevea@cse.unsw.edu.au
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process@cse.unsw.edu.au
>Originator: alt-photo-process@cse.unsw.edu.au
>Precedence: bulk
>Subject: Re: Gum prints with the enlarger
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: Alternative Photographic Processes mailing list
>
>
>I have been using an modified enlarger for the past 10 to 12 years.
>
>Is is a Durst J606 enlarger equipped with a 300 watt halogen light source
>which requires a 5 to 90 minutes exposure time depending upon the
>negative's density range and the extent of the enlargement. I had
>combined the light source and condensers from a B&H slide projector into
>the Durst enlarger head (with 50mm f2.8) and added a cooling fan remotely
>mounted with the cooling air fed through a flexible duct.
>
>I have used it for extensive experimenting and find it reasonably sharp
>though I feel that contact printing gives superior results.
>
>If anyone is interested in building a copy, I will forward photos that
>should be helpful.
>
>Art Chakalis
>Columbus, Ohio, USA
>
>
I would like to see the pictures.Sounds very interesting
Alan Kleiman
akleiman@infoabc.com