Please don't go! None of us (which of course includes myself) is
**fail-safe** in conveying our intented remarks.
The thing about list interchanges is that we find meanings in messages
beyond those intended by the writer. And we feel free to inform the
writer about what we find.
When that happens to us (when we receive such responses to our own
messages), we have an opportunity to recognize implications of what we
wrote.
So I must say in this regard, thanks Judy for correcting (in your June 5th
message) my misinterpretation of your earlier comment. Yes, my wording
did imply that there was a conscious policy by men to exclude women from
exhibitions and authorship in photographic magazines--which, as you point
out, was not a part of your or Ginger's original description.
Russell, I hope to read future messages by you on this list.
ron
On Wed, 5 Jun 1996, Russell Cothren wrote:
>
> You folks are a hoot! :-) It is obvious that my writing failed to
> reveal what i was trying to say. Maybe that is why i photograph for
> writers. I wasnt trying to assign anything to any one. I leave that to the
> critics. I'll stick to photgraphy. That seems to be where i comunicate
> best. Back to my hole.
>
> Russell Cothren
> Photo Editor
> University Relations
> University of Arkansas
> 501-575-3970
>
>
>