Re: physiology vs. sensitometry

Peter charles fredrick (pete@fotem.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 12 Jun 96 09:10:19 +1000

Judy wrote

>>I have been dumbfounded, not to say drastically fuddled, at the recent
discussion parsing how many tones the Parker Roll Law says you can have of
the total available compared to the original heaviest density -- or
something. If all photography is is the most excruciatingly perfect
replication devisable by an indefatigable cadre of maestros, give me, um,
tap dancing.<<

Whats wrong with tap dancing ?

pete