Judy said that if ALL photography were to be a replication etc
This was a false inference. Nobody was suggesting that.
In reference to Judy's statement l said:
"I think I will print this out and post it on the wall of my darkroom.
Or, better yet, on the walls of all the darkrooms at schools and
universities that teach photography..."
Terry said:
"Are you suggesting that students should not understand what
they are doing, and that they should not have the creative choice
to use the medium as they wish, which technical competence
would give them."
"Gee, Terry, this is EXACTLY what I am saying... You read between the
lines so well. Duhhhhh....."
I do not really believe that. You are really saying that they should not have
the technical competence which they need to choose how to use it ?
"The point is that many photography students (led by misguided photography
teachers) get so involved in the technical aspects of photography and
print making that technical proficiency becomes the end, rather than
the means to an end."
That is just as deplorable as the converse where no teaching of the art and the
craft is provided.
"Certainly, technical understanding of the
process and the ability to execute the process well are invaluable
tools for accompishing great work. I would never suggest that
students should not understand what they are doing."
But you just did.
" I would argue
that overemphasis on the technical aspects results in students that
make perfect prints from perfect negatives of images made while
they didn't know what they were doing. "
I agree.
It seems that we are agreed that we need technical competence and understanding
of how to use that competence.
Terry
But, by all means, continue tap dancing if that is your preference.
Kerik